Difference between revisions of "Kiln Lane"

From Lacey Green History

Line 42: Line 42:
  
 
Additional evidence suggests brick making may have played a part in the destruction of the Ditch in the Kiln Lane area. This will be dealt with in a later chapter. Whatever the purpose of the Ditch, the sections visible today are but a shadow of their former appearance. Indications suggest the project was well planned and the route surveyed. This is evident from the fact that the Ditch lies about half a mile back from the escarpment edge throughout its entire length. It was certainly a massive undertaking and the work of many hands and resources.  Perhaps Iron Age man was the first to set foot in ‘Kiln Lane’?  Other sections of Grim's Ditch occur in Oxfordshire, but it is uncertain if these form part of the same work.
 
Additional evidence suggests brick making may have played a part in the destruction of the Ditch in the Kiln Lane area. This will be dealt with in a later chapter. Whatever the purpose of the Ditch, the sections visible today are but a shadow of their former appearance. Indications suggest the project was well planned and the route surveyed. This is evident from the fact that the Ditch lies about half a mile back from the escarpment edge throughout its entire length. It was certainly a massive undertaking and the work of many hands and resources.  Perhaps Iron Age man was the first to set foot in ‘Kiln Lane’?  Other sections of Grim's Ditch occur in Oxfordshire, but it is uncertain if these form part of the same work.
 +
 +
2.
 +
 +
'''The Brick Makers of ‘Lacey's Green’'''
 +
 +
 +
From the dim mists of pre-history, a giant leap forward in time, to the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. From this period documents and maps first make reference to ‘Lacies Green’, ‘Leasey Green’ and ‘Lacey’s Green’. It is reasonable to assume therefore that the first foundations of the community were being laid at this time.
 +
 +
 +
 +
From the fourteenth century onwards, brick and tile making became an established industry in various parts of the Chilterns. At a far later date, as the name Kiln Lane indicates, brick making came to Lacey Green. Evidence suggests it was possibly in operation for well over a century. Several generations of the Floyd family were engaged as proprietors.
 +
 +
 +
One of the earliest references is to 'John Floyd, Brickmaker’, who was buried in Princes Risborough on Ist February 1/03, and Hampden Estate Records mention ‘Lacey Green Kiln’ in the year 1752.
 +
 +
 +
A Joseph Floyd, described as a ‘Brickmaker, of Lacey’s Green’, made his Will on the 11th May 1745. He bequeathed to his wife, Ellinor, property in Loosley Row and Princes Risborough. Sadly, however, he makes no reference to the Brick Kiln. Joseph was buried in Princes Risborough on the 9th December 1756. Ellinor also died before she could take upon herself the execution of the Will. On 8th June 1758, Administration was granted to son, William.
 +
 +
 +
An Indenture, dated 2nd October 1761, refers to ‘William Floyd of Lacey’s Green, Brickmaker’. He is described as the ‘son of and also named in the Will and Testament of Joseph Floyd, late of the same place, Brickmaker’.
 +
 +
 +
William Floyd, distinguished as ‘the Elder’, made his Will on the 9th May 1801 and died shortly afterwards. He bequeathed property in Speen to his daughter, Mary Stone. His son, also named William, was to receive a legacy of ‘sixty pounds of lawful money of Great Britain’. Provision is made for his three grandchildren, Joseph, Elizabeth and John, the children of his deceased son, John, who had died in 1800, at the age of 51 years, leaving his Widow with three small children, all of whom were under the age of five.
 +
 +
 +
William, Senior, then makes specific reference to the Brick Kiln. William, Junior, and son-in-law Francis Stone are to receive property and land in Loosley Row and Princes Risborough. Additional land includes, ‘my garden plot near or adjoining to the Brick Kiln at Lacey’s Green’, also, ‘a small Close or Paddock with the Trees thereon Growing lying near to the said Kiln’.
 +
 +
 +
William, Junior, was buried in Princes Risborough on 31st October 1821. A Widower, the entry in the Princes Risborough Parish Registers describes him as a ‘Kiln Man of Lacey’s Green, aged 76 years’.
 +
 +
 +
The Hampden Estate Account Books of the Earl of Buckinghamshire refer to a William Floyd supplying bricks and lime to the value of 14s.9d in 1764 for repairs at Green Hailey. Another entry for July 1772 records William Floyd supplying seven hundred and fifty bricks and twenty bushels of lime. These goods, to the value of £1.1s.10d, were for work at a farm in Hampden Row. This bill, like so many more in the Estate Accounts, was not paid until eight months later. This appears to be a general trend; some bills not being settled until a year later. It seems likely this William Floyd was probably the same William referred to above as ‘the Elder’. One wonders if the long wait for the settlement of the account would have had a serious effect on the financial side of the business.
 +
 +
 +
In February 1798 Britain had been at war with France for five years. Instructions were issued by the authorities to make returns of all able-bodied males, between fifteen and sixty years. The returns did not include those already serving in a military capacity, but those who could be called upon in case of ‘invasion or any other attempt of the enemy upon our coasts’. The whole project took eighteen days from conception to completion. The speed of the Operation was no mean feat, even by modern standards.
 +
 +
 +
Complete returns for the Posse Comitatus survive for no county in England or Wales other than Buckinghamshire. The returns for Princes Risborough record a total of three hundred and fifty one men, of these, one hundred and fifty three were from the Upper Hamlets, (i.e. Lacey Green, Loosley Row, Speen).
 +
 +
 +
Amongst those recorded in the Upper Hamlets are John Floyd, William Floyd, Senior, and William Floyd, Junior. The returns also record the occupations of those listed therein. The Floyd’s, however, are recorded merely as ‘Labourers’. Perhaps the art of brick making did not warrant a special category.
 +
 +
 +
The main site of the Kiln is associated with ‘Malmsmead’, formerly Kiln Farm. The four acres of land then attached to the property, alongside Kiln Lane, constituted the brickwork fields. An Estate map of Lord George Henry Cavendish, dated 1818, indicates that the Kiln once covered a far larger area, extending a considerable distance to the south-east of this site.
 +
 +
 +
A map in the County Record Office in Aylesbury, surveyed in 1810, but not published until 1820/21, shows the site connected with ‘Malmsmead’. In the early years of the twentieth century, the foundations of a building were discovered in the nearby garden of ‘Kiln Cottages’, now ‘Kiln Barn’. These were assumed to have had some connection with the Kiln. Clearly recorded on the above map are a group of buildings associated with the Kiln, in what is now the garden of ‘Highwood’.
 +
 +
 +
Evidence supporting the existence of former buildings was confirmed in the spring of 1999. During building Operations on the site, a seam of bricks, tile rubble and a copingstone were unearthed at a depth of about one metre, along the bank forming Grim’s Ditch. The bricks were glazed, either on their ends, or along one edge. It is open to conjecture whether this was the site of the Kiln, or merely rubbish dumped after brick making operations ceased.
 +
 +
 +
Glazed bricks are unusual but not unheard of in Buckinghamshire and were occasionally used for decorative effect on buildings. Perhaps the Lacey Green Kiln specialized in this type of brick.
 +
 +
 +
This also leads to speculation that Grim’s Ditch may have suffered mutilation during the time of brick making here. Up to some thirty years ago, in pastureland immediately south-west of ‘Highwood’, there were two shallow depressions, suggesting clay had been dug at this spot. These supposed ‘pits’ would again have been made in the line of Grim’s Ditch.
 +
 +
 +
It is possible this was the site of the Kiln only in its latter days of operation. In the garden of ‘Pondside’, to the north of the Lane, fragments of brick have also been found. These, too, revealed signs of glazing. Could this indicate that there were several ‘Kiln’ sites, over the course of time, within Kiln Lane?
 +
 +
 +
The evidence of a number of possible large pits, located by the geophysical survey on the St. John's School site, is also interesting. This would suggest brick making might once have been in Operation some distance to the south-east of Kiln Lane.
 +
 +
 +
A survey of the Parish of Princes Risborough was undertaken in 1808, 1809 and 1810. The purpose was to make an assessment regarding the re-valuation of property for Land Tax purposes. Due to some political quirk, however, the findings were never implemented. Some entries under the heading, ‘Princes Risborough Uphill District’ are interesting. William Floyd had just over three acres of land, with a house, garden and orchard, valued at £6.8s.0d. Widow Floyd, presumably Sarah, the wife of John, held a little over four acres in her own right. This included a house, garden, Smith's shop and old inclosures. Total values of these were £7.1s.0d.
 +
 +
 +
Widow Floyd also has an interest in two other parcels of land. Over sixty acres of land, including a ‘homestall’ and old inclosure, are entered under her name, as occupier. The proprietor of this property is listed as ‘Matthews Esq’. The brick kiln and yard, an area of just over two roods, are valued at £2.0s.0d. The proprietor of the Kiln is John Grubb Esq., Lord of the Manor. Although most of the Floyd property was situated in other parts of the village, this is proof they retained a stake in the Kiln.
 +
 +
 +
Another entry regarding Stephen Clark*, occupier and proprietor of property in Turnip End, is noteworthy. Additionally, located ‘near Lacey Green Brick Kiln’, he has a house and garden situated in an area of nineteen perches, valued at £3.0s.0d.
 +
 +
 +
Mrs Floyd is recorded as paying the rates on a house, land and Kiln in the years 1814 and 1815. A further entry states ‘Thomas Dell took William Floyd’s Kiln Farm from late Buckle Hawes’.
 +
 +
 +
The Land Tax Returns for the ‘Upper Hamlets’, dated 1820, list John Grubb as the proprietor of the Kiln. The occupiers, who pay the assessment, are recorded as ‘late Floyd Executors’.
 +
 +
 +
Discussions were taking place at this time, regarding the Enclosure of the Parish of Princes Risborough. Apart for an obvious death in the family, this may have been a very difficult time for the Floyd’s.
 +
 +
 +
From 1801 a Census took place in the Princes Risborough area. This was prior to the nation-wide general registration of 1841, when additional information, such as all names in the household, ages and relationships were required. These early Censuses record only the name of the householder, the number of males and females, ages and occupations of those residing within a household.
 +
 +
 +
In the 1821 Census the household of Joseph Floyd is recorded. This states that two families were living in one household. Two males over the age of twenty years are resident, one engaged in agriculture, the other following a trade. The ages and number of males/females recorded, suggest Joseph's Mother and his younger brother may have been living with him and his family. Other sources record J oseph’s occupations as a kilnman, yeoman and shopkeeper. This could indicate the beginning of a decline in the brick making industry for the Floyd’s.
 +
 +
 +
The household of Joseph Floyd appears again in the 1831 Census, this time as one family in one house. Joseph is described as a Shopkeeper. Another entry from the same Census records two households, those of Daniel Ridgeley and Samuel Lacey, at the Kiln. Amongst the two families are five males over the age of twenty, all of whom are engaged as agriculture labourers. This may imply either new occupiers at the Kiln, or the return of the land to agricultural use.
 +
 +
 +
The discovery, on the brick kiln site, of George III pennies (1760-1820) and a clay pipe, certainly denotes activity of some nature, during the reign of that Monarch.
 +
 +
 +
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Possibly Clinch. In the transcribed copies of the re-valuation of property for Land Tax purposes, quoted above, Stephen Clark is clearly recorded. However, in the Enclosure Awards, fifteen years later, the corresponding property at Turnip End is awarded to Stephen Clinch, but there is no reference to a house in Kiln Lane.
 +
 +
 
[[Category:Roads of Lacey Green]]
 
[[Category:Roads of Lacey Green]]

Revision as of 07:55, 1 March 2024


research by Joan West.

Kiln Lane began as a track to village ponds. Subsequent cottages built had to give a right of way to the ponds and other old properties. It was recognised officially as a road in 1823.

For Ian Kelloway's article in full click -3645

Dennis Claydon published a booklet called "Tarmac and Beyond". Much was known about Kiln Lane, but Dennis Claydon researched and wrote about it so brilliantly that the history of the lane written here will include extracts from his booklet leaving nothing out. A few later facts have been added.

-

Rosemary Mortham wrote the following introduction, dated February 2003 : -

The coming of the year 2000 was celebrated in Kiln Lane with the burying of a time capsule in the garden of 'Pondside'; also a most enjoyable "Millennium" Party, held in midsummer rather than New Year's Day, in the hope of enjoying good weather. We were indeed blessed by a beautiful day. Everyone was out bright and early for a shared lunch in the field next to "Highwood", which had been kindly loaned for the occasion by Dennis Claydon.

The highlight of the day was a walk down our Lane, led by Dennis. We were fascinated by the stories which he told, and amazed by the amount of information which he had amassed about one small lane. It was generally felt that this should be recorded for future generations, and after some nagging by me, Dennis agreed to give it a try.

A good deal of further research led to the production of this small book. Co-incidentally, it would appear that the area of Kiln Lane can be traced back for at least the 2000 years that brought about this production.

The story of Kiln Lane is told here with information from "Tarmac and Beyond" by Denis Claydon

  1. Grim’s Ditch

The village of Lacey Green, south-east of Princes Risborough in Buckinghamshire, is situated high in the Chiltern Hills, overlooking the Vale of Aylesbury. Kiln Lane lies towards the south-eastern outskirts of the village. From its junction with Main Road, this unpretentious lane heads north-eastwards, soon leaving the confines of the village, thence curving down into a deep narrow valley and continuing eastwards, towards Speen.

Undoubtedly, the oldest feature of Kiln Lane is Grim's Ditch, an ancient earthwork, consisting of an earthen bank and ditch. The name is derived from folklore, which attributed any mysterious earthwork to the Devil, sometimes known as Grim, hence Grim's Ditch.

It can be traced at intervals, for sixteen miles across the Chilterns, running south-west to north-east, from Bradenham to Berkhamsted.

One writer refers to the earthwork as ‘a silent serpent of antiquity’, its origins being obscure. However, archaeologists generally agree it is of a non-defensive nature, probably a division between upland and lowland pasture or a tribal boundary. There have been some differences of opinion about the age of the earthwork. Some historians considered it belonged to the Anglo-Saxon era, whilst others favoured an Iron Age origin.

In 1992 this controversy was finally resolved. During construction of the A41 bypass, between Tring and the M25, Hertfordshire Archaeological Trust took the opportunity to research twelve sites. As a result, conclusive evidence was discovered which dated the Ditch to the early or middle Iron Age, around 400 BC. This makes the ditch one of the most important prehistoric works in Buckinghamshire.

Grim's Ditch approaches Lacey Green from the south-east, stopping short at the southern end of the village. After a five hundred-metre break, the earthwork re-emerges again in Kiln Lane, heading in a north-easterly direction, having turned almost at right angles. The Kiln Lane section is located just outside of the curtilage of the village. Lying to the east of the Lane, there is evidence of its course passing through the gardens of two properties and adjacent pastureland. The Ditch continues beside Bridleway L21, which descends steeply into a valley. Crossing Kiln Lane on the valley floor, the earthwork continues north-eastwards, by bridleway and public footpath, enroute to Great Hampden. This two and a half mile stretch is the longest complete section in the Chilterns.

The Ordnance Survey map reveals the earthwork turning at right angles in Lacey Green and again in the vicinity of Great Hampden. Whether this is due to the lie of the land, or for some other reason, is uncertain. The village of Speen, lying to the south-east, is thus embraced on three sides by the earthwork. This has given rise to a theory that the village may mark the site of an ancient settlement. The theory, however, is very difficult to prove and must remain a matter of conjecture.

Is the gap in Grim's Ditch in Lacey Green genuine? Did the community of Lacey Green become established in this gap? Was this an entrance into the inner confines of the earthwork? If not, can the course of the earthwork be traced, since it is no longer visible on the ground? In an effort to answer some of these questions a geophysical survey was carried out on two sites in 1999. One site was north of St. John's Primary School, the second just south of Kiln Lane, adjacent to Stocken Farm.

The Lacey Green School survey area produced somewhat negative results. There were some indications of a former structure, plus a number of large pits up to five metres across. The Stocken Farm site, however, was more positive with evidence of an interrupted linear feature, possibly a six metre wide ditch with a bank to the north of this. This ditch aligned with the closest extant sections of Grim's Ditch in Kiln Lane, to the north-east. The results of the survey indicate the monument probably extended at least as far south-west as Main Road. It is suggested, therefore, that the gap is probably a genuine one. Another theory, which cannot be proven, is that the course of the Ditch continued along the present route of Main Road, linking with the section at the southern end of the village.

Additional evidence suggests brick making may have played a part in the destruction of the Ditch in the Kiln Lane area. This will be dealt with in a later chapter. Whatever the purpose of the Ditch, the sections visible today are but a shadow of their former appearance. Indications suggest the project was well planned and the route surveyed. This is evident from the fact that the Ditch lies about half a mile back from the escarpment edge throughout its entire length. It was certainly a massive undertaking and the work of many hands and resources. Perhaps Iron Age man was the first to set foot in ‘Kiln Lane’? Other sections of Grim's Ditch occur in Oxfordshire, but it is uncertain if these form part of the same work.

2.

The Brick Makers of ‘Lacey's Green’


From the dim mists of pre-history, a giant leap forward in time, to the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. From this period documents and maps first make reference to ‘Lacies Green’, ‘Leasey Green’ and ‘Lacey’s Green’. It is reasonable to assume therefore that the first foundations of the community were being laid at this time.


From the fourteenth century onwards, brick and tile making became an established industry in various parts of the Chilterns. At a far later date, as the name Kiln Lane indicates, brick making came to Lacey Green. Evidence suggests it was possibly in operation for well over a century. Several generations of the Floyd family were engaged as proprietors.


One of the earliest references is to 'John Floyd, Brickmaker’, who was buried in Princes Risborough on Ist February 1/03, and Hampden Estate Records mention ‘Lacey Green Kiln’ in the year 1752.


A Joseph Floyd, described as a ‘Brickmaker, of Lacey’s Green’, made his Will on the 11th May 1745. He bequeathed to his wife, Ellinor, property in Loosley Row and Princes Risborough. Sadly, however, he makes no reference to the Brick Kiln. Joseph was buried in Princes Risborough on the 9th December 1756. Ellinor also died before she could take upon herself the execution of the Will. On 8th June 1758, Administration was granted to son, William.


An Indenture, dated 2nd October 1761, refers to ‘William Floyd of Lacey’s Green, Brickmaker’. He is described as the ‘son of and also named in the Will and Testament of Joseph Floyd, late of the same place, Brickmaker’.


William Floyd, distinguished as ‘the Elder’, made his Will on the 9th May 1801 and died shortly afterwards. He bequeathed property in Speen to his daughter, Mary Stone. His son, also named William, was to receive a legacy of ‘sixty pounds of lawful money of Great Britain’. Provision is made for his three grandchildren, Joseph, Elizabeth and John, the children of his deceased son, John, who had died in 1800, at the age of 51 years, leaving his Widow with three small children, all of whom were under the age of five.


William, Senior, then makes specific reference to the Brick Kiln. William, Junior, and son-in-law Francis Stone are to receive property and land in Loosley Row and Princes Risborough. Additional land includes, ‘my garden plot near or adjoining to the Brick Kiln at Lacey’s Green’, also, ‘a small Close or Paddock with the Trees thereon Growing lying near to the said Kiln’.


William, Junior, was buried in Princes Risborough on 31st October 1821. A Widower, the entry in the Princes Risborough Parish Registers describes him as a ‘Kiln Man of Lacey’s Green, aged 76 years’.


The Hampden Estate Account Books of the Earl of Buckinghamshire refer to a William Floyd supplying bricks and lime to the value of 14s.9d in 1764 for repairs at Green Hailey. Another entry for July 1772 records William Floyd supplying seven hundred and fifty bricks and twenty bushels of lime. These goods, to the value of £1.1s.10d, were for work at a farm in Hampden Row. This bill, like so many more in the Estate Accounts, was not paid until eight months later. This appears to be a general trend; some bills not being settled until a year later. It seems likely this William Floyd was probably the same William referred to above as ‘the Elder’. One wonders if the long wait for the settlement of the account would have had a serious effect on the financial side of the business.


In February 1798 Britain had been at war with France for five years. Instructions were issued by the authorities to make returns of all able-bodied males, between fifteen and sixty years. The returns did not include those already serving in a military capacity, but those who could be called upon in case of ‘invasion or any other attempt of the enemy upon our coasts’. The whole project took eighteen days from conception to completion. The speed of the Operation was no mean feat, even by modern standards.


Complete returns for the Posse Comitatus survive for no county in England or Wales other than Buckinghamshire. The returns for Princes Risborough record a total of three hundred and fifty one men, of these, one hundred and fifty three were from the Upper Hamlets, (i.e. Lacey Green, Loosley Row, Speen).


Amongst those recorded in the Upper Hamlets are John Floyd, William Floyd, Senior, and William Floyd, Junior. The returns also record the occupations of those listed therein. The Floyd’s, however, are recorded merely as ‘Labourers’. Perhaps the art of brick making did not warrant a special category.


The main site of the Kiln is associated with ‘Malmsmead’, formerly Kiln Farm. The four acres of land then attached to the property, alongside Kiln Lane, constituted the brickwork fields. An Estate map of Lord George Henry Cavendish, dated 1818, indicates that the Kiln once covered a far larger area, extending a considerable distance to the south-east of this site.


A map in the County Record Office in Aylesbury, surveyed in 1810, but not published until 1820/21, shows the site connected with ‘Malmsmead’. In the early years of the twentieth century, the foundations of a building were discovered in the nearby garden of ‘Kiln Cottages’, now ‘Kiln Barn’. These were assumed to have had some connection with the Kiln. Clearly recorded on the above map are a group of buildings associated with the Kiln, in what is now the garden of ‘Highwood’.


Evidence supporting the existence of former buildings was confirmed in the spring of 1999. During building Operations on the site, a seam of bricks, tile rubble and a copingstone were unearthed at a depth of about one metre, along the bank forming Grim’s Ditch. The bricks were glazed, either on their ends, or along one edge. It is open to conjecture whether this was the site of the Kiln, or merely rubbish dumped after brick making operations ceased.


Glazed bricks are unusual but not unheard of in Buckinghamshire and were occasionally used for decorative effect on buildings. Perhaps the Lacey Green Kiln specialized in this type of brick.


This also leads to speculation that Grim’s Ditch may have suffered mutilation during the time of brick making here. Up to some thirty years ago, in pastureland immediately south-west of ‘Highwood’, there were two shallow depressions, suggesting clay had been dug at this spot. These supposed ‘pits’ would again have been made in the line of Grim’s Ditch.


It is possible this was the site of the Kiln only in its latter days of operation. In the garden of ‘Pondside’, to the north of the Lane, fragments of brick have also been found. These, too, revealed signs of glazing. Could this indicate that there were several ‘Kiln’ sites, over the course of time, within Kiln Lane?


The evidence of a number of possible large pits, located by the geophysical survey on the St. John's School site, is also interesting. This would suggest brick making might once have been in Operation some distance to the south-east of Kiln Lane.


A survey of the Parish of Princes Risborough was undertaken in 1808, 1809 and 1810. The purpose was to make an assessment regarding the re-valuation of property for Land Tax purposes. Due to some political quirk, however, the findings were never implemented. Some entries under the heading, ‘Princes Risborough Uphill District’ are interesting. William Floyd had just over three acres of land, with a house, garden and orchard, valued at £6.8s.0d. Widow Floyd, presumably Sarah, the wife of John, held a little over four acres in her own right. This included a house, garden, Smith's shop and old inclosures. Total values of these were £7.1s.0d.


Widow Floyd also has an interest in two other parcels of land. Over sixty acres of land, including a ‘homestall’ and old inclosure, are entered under her name, as occupier. The proprietor of this property is listed as ‘Matthews Esq’. The brick kiln and yard, an area of just over two roods, are valued at £2.0s.0d. The proprietor of the Kiln is John Grubb Esq., Lord of the Manor. Although most of the Floyd property was situated in other parts of the village, this is proof they retained a stake in the Kiln.


Another entry regarding Stephen Clark*, occupier and proprietor of property in Turnip End, is noteworthy. Additionally, located ‘near Lacey Green Brick Kiln’, he has a house and garden situated in an area of nineteen perches, valued at £3.0s.0d.


Mrs Floyd is recorded as paying the rates on a house, land and Kiln in the years 1814 and 1815. A further entry states ‘Thomas Dell took William Floyd’s Kiln Farm from late Buckle Hawes’.


The Land Tax Returns for the ‘Upper Hamlets’, dated 1820, list John Grubb as the proprietor of the Kiln. The occupiers, who pay the assessment, are recorded as ‘late Floyd Executors’.


Discussions were taking place at this time, regarding the Enclosure of the Parish of Princes Risborough. Apart for an obvious death in the family, this may have been a very difficult time for the Floyd’s.


From 1801 a Census took place in the Princes Risborough area. This was prior to the nation-wide general registration of 1841, when additional information, such as all names in the household, ages and relationships were required. These early Censuses record only the name of the householder, the number of males and females, ages and occupations of those residing within a household.


In the 1821 Census the household of Joseph Floyd is recorded. This states that two families were living in one household. Two males over the age of twenty years are resident, one engaged in agriculture, the other following a trade. The ages and number of males/females recorded, suggest Joseph's Mother and his younger brother may have been living with him and his family. Other sources record J oseph’s occupations as a kilnman, yeoman and shopkeeper. This could indicate the beginning of a decline in the brick making industry for the Floyd’s.


The household of Joseph Floyd appears again in the 1831 Census, this time as one family in one house. Joseph is described as a Shopkeeper. Another entry from the same Census records two households, those of Daniel Ridgeley and Samuel Lacey, at the Kiln. Amongst the two families are five males over the age of twenty, all of whom are engaged as agriculture labourers. This may imply either new occupiers at the Kiln, or the return of the land to agricultural use.


The discovery, on the brick kiln site, of George III pennies (1760-1820) and a clay pipe, certainly denotes activity of some nature, during the reign of that Monarch.


* Possibly Clinch. In the transcribed copies of the re-valuation of property for Land Tax purposes, quoted above, Stephen Clark is clearly recorded. However, in the Enclosure Awards, fifteen years later, the corresponding property at Turnip End is awarded to Stephen Clinch, but there is no reference to a house in Kiln Lane.