Conclusions on Money - Revision history

Caroline: Category:Joan West Conclusion

2020-08-22T22:07:20Z

Category:Joan West Conclusion

Caroline at 22:06, 22 August 2020

2020-08-22T22:06:37Z

Caroline at 22:05, 22 August 2020

2020-08-22T22:05:45Z

Joan: Created page with "So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Prince..."

2019-06-20T08:01:21Z

Created page with "So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Prince..."

New page

So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 22 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.		So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.
−
−	~~[[Catagory:Joan West Conclusion]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 22 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.		So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.

−	[[Catagory:Joan West Conclusion)	+	[[Catagory:Joan West Conclusion]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 22 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.		So far no record of the use of Banks locally has been found before the twentieth century and then it was more likely to be a Building Society or similar. The Manor of Princes Risborough had historically owned everything, letting out parcels of land. These tenants appear to have been people with money or in a position to borrow money. The Manor itself did not give them mortgages. It was usual for these tenants to buy their Manor tenancy as an investment and promptly sublet the property. The sub-letting tenants and sometimes there were sub-sub-letting tenants, appear to have all borrowed money in the form of mortgages, frequently from the vendor if a small amount. Every purchase for land, for money to build a house thereon, every addition to land was covered by another mortgage. No purchaser had money in hand. The mortgages were often for only a few years, with interest at 5% or so. Most were paid off on time from income earned.
		+
		+	[[Catagory:Joan West Conclusion)